The Smart Forecaster

 Pursuing best practices in demand planning,

forecasting and inventory optimization

When implementing inventory optimization, the pressure is on to get results.  As the Major League Baseball season starts it’s final stretch towards the playoffs, we thought this analogy might help enforce an important point about the pace of deploying a new inventory optimization process.


The Situation

It’s the bottom of the ninth and your team is down by a run.  You step up to the plate batting lead-off. With the roar of the crowd and excitement in the air, you are tempted to swing hard for that elusive home run.  As you dig into the batter’s box, you weigh the options and decide on a better approach: stay patient and do whatever you can to get one base.  You don’t try to hit a home run and focus on making good contact with the ball. You know that in this situation, a single will do.  By getting on base you help build team confidence.  Most importantly, you put the team in a better position to win the game than taking an aggressive but risky swing of the bat.

3 Reasons for a Progressive Approach to Inventory Optimization

When the pressure is on to optimize inventory, you might want to move fast much like the hitter who wants to hit that home run.  And in some cases, swinging for the fences might be the recommended approach.  More often than not, a progressive approach to inventory optimization is more effective.  Here are three reasons why:

  1. It builds user confidence and creates momentum
  2. Early success buys necessary time to get full management buy-in
  3. Corporate roll out of a new process requires progressive evidence of success


Industry Example

A case in point is a multinational company offering next day PC and electronic device repair services.  They never know what will come in for repair, but need to set inventory policy to meet their next day service commitment for thousands of parts, while keeping inventory to a minimum.  They’ve chosen our inventory optimization software to help and are in the process of implementing.  The planning team has taken this progressive approach, working brand by brand to set optimal reorder points and order quantities using Smart’s probability forecasting engine.  They selected one brand to illustrate the process and show results: starting with 26 items, they filtered out 14 parts with little or no demand history.  Assessing the remaining 12, they showed how to reduce inventory by $51,000 while increasing service levels.  While the $51,000 reduction was just a small proportion of the overall benefit, it was easily understood, and presenting it has helped gain support to build out their inventory optimization implementation, brand by brand across the company.

Confidence is Key

User confidence is key and this comes with mastering the use of the inventory optimization software and being able to present results.  So, too, is management confidence.  We have encountered situations where optimization scenarios have clearly shown opportunities for large inventory savings, but staff were reluctant to seize them.  Why?  Because they would be reducing inventory, and that felt risky.  Again, selecting a subset of items, working through the optimization process, and gaining the top-down management support to make the change made all the difference.  And they will substantially reduce their inventory as a result.

Inventory Optimization success comes with a motivated team, the right technology, and solid execution of a good plan.  A progressive approach to implementation reduces risk, validates the plan, and provides the foundation for an effective inventory planning and optimization program.

Download Smart Inventory Optimization product sheet here:

Leave a Comment

Related Posts

Call an Audible to Proactively Counter Supply Chain Noise

Call an Audible to Proactively Counter Supply Chain Noise

You know the situation: You work out the best way to manage each inventory item by computing the proper reorder points and replenishment targets, then average demand increases or decreases, or demand volatility changes, or suppliers’ lead times change, or your own costs change.

Recent Posts

  • Mature bearded mechanic in uniform examining the machine and repairing it in factoryPlanning for Consumable vs. Repairable Parts
    When deciding on the right stocking parameters for spare and replacement parts, it is important to distinguish between consumable and repairable parts. These differences are often overlooked by inventory planning software and can result in incorrect estimates of what to stock. Different approaches are required when planning for consumables vs. repairables. […]
  • Four Common Mistakes when Planning Replenishment TargetsFour Common Mistakes when Planning Replenishment Targets
    How often do you recalibrate your stocking policies? Why? Learn how to avoid key mistakes when planning replenishment targets by automating the process, recalibrating parts, using targeting forecasting methods, and reviewing exceptions. […]
  • Smart Software is pleased to introduce our series of webinars, offered exclusively for Epicor Users.Extend Epicor Kinetic’s Forecasting & Min/Max Planning with Smart IP&O
    Epicor Kinetic can manage replenishment by suggesting what to order and when via reorder point-based inventory policies. The problem is that the ERP system requires that the user either manually specify these reorder points, or use a rudimentary “rule of thumb” approach based on daily averages. In this article, we will review the inventory ordering functionality in Epicor Kinetic, explain its limitations, and summarize how to reduce inventory, and minimize stockouts by providing the robust predictive functionality that is missing in Epicor. […]
  • Scenario based Forecasting vs EquationsScenario-based Forecasting vs. Equations
    Traditionally, software has served as a delivery vehicle for equations. This is fine, as far as it goes. But we at Smart Software think you would do better by trading in your equations for scenarios. Learn why Scenario-based planning helps planners better manage risk and create better outcomes. […]
  • Extend Microsoft 365 BC and NAV with Smart IP&OExtend Microsoft 365 BC and NAV with Smart IP&O
    Microsoft 365 BC and NAV can manage replenishment by suggesting what to order and when via reorder point-based inventory policies. The problem is that the ERP system requires that the user manually specify these reorder points and/or forecasts. In this article, we will review the inventory ordering functionality in Microsoft BC & NAV, explain its limitations, and summarize how to reduce inventory, and minimize stockouts by providing the robust predictive functionality that is missing in Dynamics 365. […]

    Inventory Optimization for Manufacturers, Distributors, and MRO

    • Blanket Orders Smart Software Demand and Inventory Planning HDBlanket Orders
      Our customers are great teachers who have always helped us bridge the gap between textbook theory and practical application. A prime example happened over twenty years ago, when we were introduced to the phenomenon of intermittent demand, which is common among spare parts but rare among the finished goods managed by our original customers working in sales and marketing. This revelation soon led to our preeminent position as vendors of software for managing inventories of spare parts. Our latest bit of schooling concerns “blanket orders.” […]
    • Hand placing pieces to build an arrowProbabilistic Forecasting for Intermittent Demand
      The New Forecasting Technology derives from Probabilistic Forecasting, a statistical method that accurately forecasts both average product demand per period and customer service level inventory requirements. […]
    • Engineering to Order at Kratos Space – Making Parts Availability a Strategic Advantage
      The Kratos Space group within National Security technology innovator Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., produces COTS s software and component products for space communications - Making Parts Availability a Strategic Advantage […]
    • wooden-figures-of-people-and-a-magnet-team-management-warehouse inventoryManaging the Inventory of Promoted Items
      In a previous post, I discussed one of the thornier problems demand planners sometimes face: working with product demand data characterized by what statisticians call skewness—a situation that can necessitate costly inventory investments. This sort of problematic data is found in several different scenarios. In at least one, the combination of intermittent demand and very effective sales promotions, the problem lends itself to an effective solution. […]