Inventory overstocking can harm both financial stability and operational efficiency. When an organization is overstocked, it ties up capital in excess inventory that might not sell, increasing storage costs and the risk of inventory obsolescence. Additionally, the funds used to purchase the excess inventory could have been better invested in other areas of the business, such as marketing or research and development. Overstocking also hampers cash flow, as money is locked in stock rather than available for immediate operational needs. Managing inventory effectively is critical for maintaining a healthy balance sheet and ensuring that resources are optimally allocated. Here is an in-depth exploration of the main causes of overstocking, their implications, and possible solutions.

1 Inaccurate Demand Forecasting

One of the primary causes of overstocking is inaccurate demand forecasting. When businesses rely on outdated forecasting methods or insufficient data, they can easily overestimate demand, leading to overstocking. A prime example is the clothing industry, where fashion trends can change rapidly. A well-known fashion brand recently faced challenges after overestimating demand for a new clothing line based on flawed data analysis, leading to unsold inventory.

To address this issue, companies can implement new technologies that automatically select the best forecasting methods for the data, incorporating trends and seasonal patterns to ensure accuracy. By improving forecasting accuracy, businesses can better align their inventory with actual demand, leading to more precise inventory management and fewer overstock scenarios. For instance, a Hardware retailer using Smart Demand Planner reduced forecasting errors by 15%, demonstrating the potential for significant improvement in inventory management​​​​.

2 Improper Inventory Management

Effective inventory management is fundamental to prevent overstocking. Without accurate systems to track inventory levels, businesses might order excess stock and incur higher expenses. This issue often stems from reliance on spreadsheets or inefficient ERP systems that lack real-time data integration.

State-of-the-art technologies provide real-time visibility into inventory levels, allowing businesses to automate and optimize reordering processes.  A large electric utility company faced challenges in maintaining service parts availability without overstocking, managing over 250,000 part numbers across a diverse network of power generation and distribution facilities. The company replaced its outdated system with Smart IP&O and integrated it in real-time with their Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) system. Smart IP&O enabled the utility to use “what-if” scenarios, creating digital twins of alternate stocking policies and simulating performance across key performance indicators, such as inventory value, service levels, fill rates, and shortage costs. This allowed the utility to make targeted adjustments to their stocking parameters, which were then deployed to their EAM system, driving optimal replenishments of spare parts.

The outcome was significant: a $9 million reduction in inventory, freeing up cash and valuable warehouse space while sustaining target service levels of over 99%​

3 Overly Optimistic Sales Projections

Businesses, especially those in growth phases, may predict higher sales than they achieve, leading to excess inventory intended to meet anticipated demand that never materializes. An example of this is the recent case with an electric vehicle manufacturer that projected high sales for its truck but faced production delays and lower-than-expected demand, resulting in an overstock of components and parts. This miscalculation led to increased storage costs and strained financial resources.

Another automotive aftermarket company struggled to forecast intermittently demanded parts accurately, frequently resulting in overstocking and stockouts.  Using AI-driven technology enabled the company to significantly reduce backorders and lost sales, with fill rates improving from 93% to 96% within just three months. By leveraging Smart IP&O forecasting technologies, the company could generate accurate estimates of cumulative demand over lead times, providing better visibility of potential demand scenarios. This allowed for optimized inventory levels, reducing storage costs and improving financial efficiency by aligning inventory with actual demand​.

4 Bulk Purchasing Discounts

The appeal of cost savings from bulk purchases can prompt businesses to buy more than needed, tying up capital and storage space. This often leads to storage challenges when excess stock is ordered to secure a discount.

To address this challenge, businesses should weigh the benefits of bulk discounts against the costs of holding excess inventory. Next-generation technology can help identify the most cost-effective purchasing strategy by balancing immediate savings with long-term storage costs. By implementing Smart IP&O, MNR could accurately forecast inventory requirements and optimize its inventory management processes. This led to an 8% reduction in parts inventory, reaching a high customer service level of 98.7% and reducing inventory growth for new equipment from a projected 10% to only 6%.

5 Seasonal Demand Fluctuations

Difficulty in aligning inventory with seasonal demand can result in surplus stock once the peak sales period ends. Toy manufacturers, for example, might produce too many holiday-themed toys only to face low demand after the holidays. The fashion industry frequently experiences similar challenges, with certain styles becoming obsolete as seasons change. The latest technologies can help businesses anticipate seasonal demand shifts and adjust inventory levels accordingly. By analyzing past sales data and predicting future trends, businesses can better prepare for seasonal fluctuations, minimize overstocking risk, and improve inventory turnover.

6 Supplier Lead Time Variability

Unreliable supplier lead times can lead to overstocking as a buffer against delays. If lead times improve or demand decreases unexpectedly, businesses may have excess inventory. For example, an auto parts distributor might stockpile components to mitigate supplier delays, only to find lead times improving suddenly.

Advanced technology can help by providing real-time data and predictive analytics to manage lead time variability better. These tools allow companies to dynamically adjust their orders, reducing the need for excessive safety stock.

7 Inadequate Inventory Policies

Outdated or incorrect inventory policies, such as faulty Min/Max settings, can lead to over-ordering.  However, using Modern technology to regularly review and update inventory policies ensures they align with current business needs and market conditions. By keeping policies up-to-date, businesses can reduce the risk of overstocking due to procedural errors. A recent case study demonstrated how a major retailer used Smart IP&O to revise inventory policies, resulting in a 15% reduction in overstock​​.

8 Promotions and Marketing Campaigns

Misalignment between marketing efforts and actual customer demand can cause businesses to overestimate the impact of promotions, resulting in unsold inventory. For example, a cosmetics company might overproduce a limited edition product, expecting high demand that doesn’t materialize. Leveraging Smart IP&O can help align marketing initiatives with realistic demand expectations, avoiding excess stock. By integrating marketing plans with demand forecasts, businesses can optimize their promotional strategies to better match actual customer interest.

9 Fear of Stockouts

Companies often maintain higher inventory levels to avoid stockouts, which can lead to lost sales and unhappy customers. This fear can drive businesses to overstock as a safety net, especially in industries where customer satisfaction and retention are crucial. A notable example comes from a large retail chain that significantly increased its inventory of household goods to avoid stockouts. While this strategy initially helped meet customer demand, it later resulted in excess inventory as consumer purchasing patterns stabilized. This overstocking contributed to a profit drop of nearly 90% in the second quarter, largely due to markdowns and the clearing of excess stock.

To mitigate such situations, businesses can utilize advanced inventory planning and optimization tools to provide accurate demand forecasts. For instance, a leading electronics manufacturer used Smart IP&O solution to reduce inventory levels by 20% without impacting service levels, effectively reducing costs while maintaining customer satisfaction by ensuring they had the right amount of stock on hand​​​​.

10 Overcompensation for Supply Chain Issues

Businesses may overstock to safeguard against ongoing supply chain disruptions, but this can lead to storage issues. For instance, a tech company might stockpile components to avoid potential supply chain hiccups, resulting in surplus inventory and increased costs. Advanced systems can help businesses better anticipate and respond to supply chain challenges, balancing the need for safety stock with the risk of overstocking. A technology firm used Smart IP&O to streamline its inventory strategy, reducing excess stock by 20% while maintaining supply chain resilience​​.

11 Long Lead Times and Unreliable Suppliers

Prolonged lead times and unreliable suppliers can lead businesses to order more stock than needed to cover potential supply gaps. However, less critical Items that are forecasted to achieve very high service levels represent opportunities to reduce inventory.  By targeting lower service levels on less critical items, inventory will be “right size” over time to the new equilibrium, decreasing holding costs and the value of inventory on hand. A major public transit system reduced inventory by more than $4,000,000 while improving service levels using our cutting-edge technology.

12 Lack of Real-Time Inventory Visibility

Without real-time insights into inventory, businesses often order more stock than necessary, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs. Smart IP&O enabled Seneca companies to model demand at each stocking location and, using service level-driven planning, determine how much to stock to achieve the service level we require.  By running and comparing different scenarios, they can easily define and update optimal stocking policies for each tech support rep and stockrooms.

The software has provided field technicians with evidence they did not have before, showing them their actual consumption, frequency of part use, and rationale for stocking policies, using 90% as the targeted service level norm.  Field technicians have embraced its use, with significant results:  “Zero Turns” inventory has dropped from $400K to under $100K, “First Fix Rate” exceeds 90%, and total inventory investment has decreased by more than 25%, from $11 million to $ 8 million.

In conclusion, overstocking seriously threatens business profitability and efficiency, leading to increased storage costs, tied-up capital, and potential obsolescence of goods. These issues can strain resources and limit a company’s ability to respond to market changes. However, overstocking can be effectively managed by understanding its causes, such as inaccurate demand forecasting, prolonged lead times, and unreliable suppliers. Implementing robust AI-driven solutions like Smart IP&O can help businesses optimize inventory levels, reduce excess stock, and enhance operational efficiency. By leveraging advanced forecasting and inventory optimization tools, companies can find the right balance in meeting customer demand and minimizing inventory-related costs.

The aftermarket sector provides OEMs with a decisive advantage by offering a steady revenue stream and fostering customer loyalty through the reliable and timely delivery of service parts. However, managing inventory and forecasting demand in the aftermarket is fraught with challenges, including unpredictable demand patterns, vast product ranges, and the necessity for quick turnarounds.  Traditional methods often fall short due to the complexity and variability of demand in the aftermarket. The latest technologies can analyze large datasets to predict future demand more accurately and optimize inventory levels, leading to better service and lower costs.

This blog explores how the latest AI-driven technologies can transform the OEM aftermarket by analyzing large datasets to predict future demand more accurately, optimize inventory levels, enhance forecasting accuracy, and improve customer satisfaction, ultimately leading to better service and lower costs.

Enhancing Forecast Accuracy with AI  

Using state-of-the-art technology, organizations can significantly enhance forecast accuracy by analyzing historical data, recognizing patterns, and predicting future demand. Our latest (IP&O) Inventory Planning &Optimization technology uses AI to provide real-time insights and automate decision-making processes. It employs adaptive forecasting techniques to ensure forecasts remain relevant as market conditions change. The system integrates advanced algorithms to manage intermittent data and make real-time modifications while handling complex calculations and considering factors like lead times, forecast errors, seasonality, and market trends. By leveraging better data inputs and advanced analytics, companies can significantly reduce forecast errors and minimize the costs associated with overstocking and stockouts.  Our IP&O platform is designed to handle the complexities and challenges unique to service parts management, such as intermittent demand and large assortments of parts.

Repair and Return Module: The platform accurately simulates the processes of part breakdown and repair. It predicts downtime, service levels, and inventory costs associated with the current rotating spare parts pool. Planners will know how many spares to stock to achieve short- and long-term service level requirements and, in operational settings, whether to wait for repairs to be completed and returned to service or to purchase additional service spares from suppliers, avoiding unnecessary buying and equipment downtime.

 Intermittent Demand Forecasting: IP&O’s patented intermittent demand forecasting technology provides highly accurate forecasts for items with sporadic demand patterns typical in the aftermarket. This capability is crucial for optimizing inventory levels and ensuring that critical parts are available when needed without overstocking.

Real-Time Inventory Optimization: Our technology dynamically adjusts inventory policies to align with changing demand patterns and market conditions. It calculates optimal reorder points and order quantities, balancing service levels with inventory costs. This ensures that OEMs can maintain high service levels while minimizing excess inventory and related carrying costs.

Scenario Planning and What-If Analysis: IP&O allows users to create multiple inventory scenarios to evaluate the impact of different inventory policies on service levels and costs. This capability helps OEMs make informed decisions about stocking strategies and respond proactively to market changes or supply chain disruptions.

Seamless ERP Integration: The platform offers seamless integration with leading ERP systems, such as Epicor and NetSuite, enabling automatic synchronization of forecasts and inventory data. This integration facilitates efficient execution of replenishment orders and ensures that inventory levels are continually aligned with the latest demand forecasts.

Forecast Accuracy and Reporting:  Our Advanced System provides detailed reporting and dashboards that track forecast accuracy, inventory performance, and supplier reliability. By analyzing these metrics, OEMs can continually refine their forecasting models and improve overall supply chain performance.

Real-world examples illustrate the substantial impact of AI-driven Forecasting and Inventory Optimization in the OEM aftermarket.  Prevost Parts, a division of a leading Canadian manufacturer of intercity buses and coach shells, used IP&O to address the intermittent demand of over 25,000 active parts. By integrating accurate sales forecasts and safety stock requirements into their ERP system, supported by AI and real-time machine learning adjustments, they reduced backorders by 65%, lost sales by 59%, and increased fill rates from 93% to 96% in just three months. This transformation significantly improved their inventory allocation, reducing transportation and inventory costs​​.

Incorporating AI and ML into IP&O processes is not just a technological upgrade but a strategic move that can transform the OEM aftermarket. IP&O  technology ensures better service quality and customer satisfaction by improving forecast accuracy, optimizing inventory levels, and reducing costs. As the aftermarket sector continues to grow and evolve, embracing AI will be key to staying competitive and meeting customer expectations efficiently.

Utilities have unique supply chain optimization requirements, primarily ensuring high uptime by keeping all critical machines running continuously. Achieving this involves maintaining a high availability of spare parts to guarantee a consistent, reliable, and safe supply. Additionally, as regulated entities, utilities must also carefully manage and control costs.

Managing supply chains efficiently

To maintain a reliable electricity supply at 99.99%⁺ service levels, for example, utilities must be able to respond quickly to changes in demand in the near term and accurately anticipate future demand. To do so, they must have a well-organized supply chain that allows them to purchase the necessary equipment, materials, and services from the right suppliers at the right time, in the right quantities, and at the right price.

Doing so has become increasingly more challenging in the last 3 years.

• Requirements for safety, reliability, and service delivery are more stringent.
• Supply chain disruptions, unpredictable supplier lead times, intermittent spikes in parts usage have always been problematic, but now they are more the rule than the exception.
• Deregulation in the early 2000’s removed spare parts from the list of directly reimbursed items, forcing utilities to pay for spares directly from revenues[1]
• The constant need for capital combined with aggressively climbing interest rates mean costs are scrutinized more than ever.

As a result, Supply Chain Optimization (SCO) has become an increasingly mission-critical business practice for utilities.  To contend with these challenges, utilities can no longer simply manage their supply chain — they must optimize it.  And to do that, investments in new processes and systems will be required.

[1] Scala et al. “Risk and Spare Parts Inventory in Electric Utilities”. Proceedings of the Industrial Engineering Research Conference.

Inventory Planning and Optimization   

Targeted investments in inventory optimization technology offer a path forward for every utility.  Inventory Optimization solutions should be prioritized because they:

1. Can be implemented in a fraction of the time required for initiatives in other areas, such as warehouse management, supply chain design,  and procurement consolidations. It is not uncommon to start generating benefit after 90 days and to have a full software deployment in less than 180 days.
2. Can generate massive ROI, yielding 20x returns and seven figure financial benefits annually. By better forecasting parts usage, utilities will reduce costs by purchasing only the necessary inventory while controlling the risk of stockouts that lead to downtime and poor service levels.
3. Provide foundational support for other initiatives. A strong supply chain rests on the foundation of solid usage forecasts and inventory purchasing plans.

Using predictive analytics and advanced algorithms, inventory optimization helps utilities maximize service levels and reduce operational costs by optimizing inventory levels for spare parts. For example, an electric utility might use statistical forecasting to predict future parts usage, conduct inventory audits to identify excess inventory, and leverage analytical results to identify where inventory optimization efforts should focus first. By doing this, the utility can ensure that machines are running at optimal levels and reduce the risk of costly delays due to a lack of spares.

By using analytics and data, you can identify which spare parts and equipment are most likely to be needed and order only the necessary items. This helps to ensure that equipment has high up-time. It rewards regular monitoring and adjusting of inventory levels so that when operating conditions change, you can detect the change and adjust accordingly. This implies that planning cycles must operate at a tempo high enough to keep up with changing conditions. Leveraging probabilistic forecasting to recalibrate spares stocking policies for each planning cycle ensures that stocking policies (such as min/max levels) are always up-to-date and reflect the latest parts usage and supplier lead times.

Service Levels and the Tradeoff Curve

The Service Level Tradeoff Curve relates inventory investment to item availability as measured by service level. Service level is the probability that no shortages occur between when you order more stock and when it arrives on the shelf. Surprisingly few companies have data on this important metric across their whole fleet of spare parts.

The Service Level Tradeoff Curve exposes the link between the costs associated with different levels of service and the inventory requirements needed to achieve them.  Knowing which components are important to maintaining high service levels is key to the optimization process and is determined by several factors, including inventory item standardization, criticality, historical usage, and known future repair orders. By understanding this relationship, utilities can better allocate resources, as when using the curves to identify areas where costs can be reduced without hurting system reliability.

With inventory optimization software, setting stocking policies is pure guesswork: It is possible to know how any given increase or decrease will impact service levels other than rough cut estimates.  How the changes will play out in terms of inventory investment, operating costs, and shortage costs, is something no one really knows.  Most utilities rely on rule of thumb methods and arbitrarily adjust stocking policies in a reactive manner after something has gone wrong such as a large stockout or inventory write off.  When adjustments are made this way, there is no fact-based analysis detailing how this change is expected to impact the metrics that matter:  service levels and inventory values.

Inventory Optimization software can compute the detailed, quantitative tradeoff curves required to make informed inventory policy choices or even recommend the target service level that results in the lowest overall operating cost (the sum of holding, ordering, and stock-out costs).  Using this analysis, large increases in stock levels may be mathematically justified when the predicted reduction in shortage costs exceeds the increase in inventory investment and associated holding costs.  By setting appropriate service levels and recalibrating policies across all active parts once every planning cycle (at least once monthly), utilities can minimize the risk of outages while controlling expenditures.

Perhaps the most critical aspects of the response to equipment breakdown are those relating to achieving a first-time fix as rapidly as possible. Having the proper spares available can be the difference between completing a single trip and increasing the mean time to repair, bearing the costs associated with several visits, and causing customer relationships to degrade.

Using modern software, you can benchmark past performance and leverage probabilistic forecasting methods to simulate future performance. By stress-testing your current inventory stocking policies against all plausible scenarios of future parts usage, you will know ahead of time how current and proposed stocking policies are likely to perform. Check out our blog post on how to measure the accuracy of your service level forecast to help you assess the accuracy of inventory recommendations that software providers will purport to provide benefit.

Leveraging Advanced Analytics and AI

When introducing automation, each utility company has its own goals to pursue, but you should begin with assessing present operations to identify areas that may be made more effective. Some companies may prioritize financial issues, but others may prioritize regulatory demands such as clean energy spending or industry-wide changes such as smart grids. Each company’s difficulties are unique, but modern software can point the way to a more effective inventory management system that minimizes excess inventory and places the correct components in the right places at the right times.

Overall, Supply Chain Optimization initiatives are essential for utilities looking to maximize their efficiency and reduce their costs. Technology allows us to make the integration process seamless, and you don’t need to replace your current ERP or EAM system by doing it.  You just need to make better use of the data you already have.

For example, one large utility launched a strategic Supply Chain Optimization (SCO) initiative and added best-in-class capabilities through the selection and integration of commercial off-the-shelf applications.  Chief among these was the Smart Inventory Planning and Optimization system (Smart IP&O), comprising Parts Forecasting / Demand Planning and Inventory Optimization functionality. Within just 90 days the software system was up and running, soon reducing inventory by $9,000,000 while maintaining spares availability at a high level. You can read the case study here Electric Utility Goes with Smart IP&O.

Utilities can ensure that they are able to manage their spare parts supplies in an efficient and cost-effective manner better preparing them for the future.  Over time, this balance between supply and demand translates to a significant edge. Understanding the Service Level Tradeoff Curve helps to understand the costs associated with different levels of service and the inventory requirements needed to achieve them. This leads to reduced operational costs, optimized inventory, and assurance that you can meet your customers’ needs.

Companies that depend on spreadsheets for demand planning, forecasting, and inventory management are often constrained by the spreadsheet’s inherent limitations. This post examines the drawbacks of traditional inventory management approaches caused by spreadsheets and their associated costs, contrasting these with the significant benefits gained from embracing state-of-the-art planning technologies.

Spreadsheets, while flexible for their infinite customizability, are fundamentally manual in nature requiring significant data management, human input, and oversight. This increases the risk of errors, from simple data entry mistakes to complex formula errors, that cause cascading effects that adversely impact forecasts.  Additionally, despite advances in collaborative features that enable multiple users to interact with a common sheet, spreadsheet-based processes are often siloed. The holder of the spreadsheet holds the data.  When this happens, many sources of data truth begin to emerge.  Without the trust of an agreed-upon, pristine, and automatically updated source of data, organizations don’t have the necessary foundation from which predictive modeling, forecasting, and analytics can be built.

In contrast, advanced planning systems like Smart IP&O are designed to overcome these limitations. Such systems are built to automatically ingest data via API or files from ERP and EAM systems, transform that data using built in ETL tools, and can process large volumes of data efficiently.  This enables businesses to manage complex inventory and forecasting tasks with greater accuracy and less manual effort because the data collection, aggregation, and transformation is already done. Transitioning to advanced planning systems is key for optimizing resources for several reasons.

Spreadsheets also have a scaling problem. The bigger the business grows, the greater the number of spreadsheets, workbooks, and formulas becomes.  The result is a tightly wound and rigid set of interdependencies that become unwieldy and inefficient.  Users will struggle to handle the increased load and complexity with slow processing times and an inability to manage large datasets and face challenges collaborating across teams and departments.

On the other hand, advanced planning systems for inventory optimization, demand planning, and inventory management are scalable, designed to grow with the business and adapt to its changing needs. This scalability ensures that companies can continue to manage their inventory and forecasting effectively, regardless of the size or complexity of their operations. By transitioning to systems like Smart IP&O, companies can not only improve the accuracy of their inventory management and forecasting but also gain a competitive edge in the market by being more responsive to changes in demand and more efficient in their operations.

Benefits of Jumping in: An electric utility company struggled to maintain service parts availability without overstocking for over 250,000-part numbers across a diverse network of power generation and distribution facilities. It replaced their twenty-year-old legacy planning process that made heavy use of spreadsheets with Smart IP&O and a real-time integration to their EAM system.  Before Smart, they were only able to modify Min/Max and Safety Stock levels infrequently.  When they did, it was nearly always because a problem occurred that triggered the review.  The methods used to change the stocking parameters relied heavily on gut feel and averages of the historical usage.   The Utility leveraged Smart’s what-if scenarios to create digital twins of alternate stocking policies and simulated how each scenario would perform across key performance indicators such as inventory value, service levels, fill rates, and shortage costs.  The software pinpointed targeted Min/Max increases and decreases that were deployed to their EAM system, driving optimal replenishments of their spare parts.  The result:  A significant inventory reduction of $9 million that freed up cash and valuable warehouse space while sustaining 99%+ target service levels.

Managing Forecast Accuracy: Forecast error is an inevitable part of inventory management, but most businesses don’t track it.  As Peter Drucker said, “You can’t improve what you don’t measure.”  A global high-tech manufacturing company utilizing a spreadsheet-based forecast process had to manually create its baseline forecasts and forecast accuracy reporting.  Given the planners’ workload and siloed processes, they just didn’t update their reports very often, and when they did, the results had to be manually distributed.  The business didn’t have a way of knowing just how accurate a given forecast was and couldn’t cite their actual errors by group of part with any confidence.  They also didn’t know whether their forecasts were outperforming a control method.  After Smart IP&O went live, the Demand Planning module automated this for them. Smart Demand Planner now automatically reforecasts their demand each planning cycle utilizing ML methods and saves accuracy reports for every part x location.  Any overrides that are applied to the forecasts can now be auto-compared to the baseline to measure forecast value add – i.e., whether the additional effort to make those changes improved the accuracy.  Now that the ability to automate the baseline statistical forecasting and produce accuracy reports is in place, this business has solid footing from which to improve their forecast process and resulting forecast accuracy.

Get it Right and Keep it Right:  Another customer in the aftermarket parts business has used Smart’s forecasting solutions since 2005 – nearly 20 years!  They were faced with challenges forecasting intermittently demanded parts sold to support their auto aftermarket business. By replacing their spreadsheet-based approach and manual uploads to SAP with statistical forecasts of demand and safety stock from SmartForecasts, they were able to significantly reduce backorders and lost sales, with fill rates improving from 93% to 96% within just three months.  The key to their success was leveraging Smart’s patented method for forecasting intermittent demand – The “Smart-Willemain” bootstrap method generated accurate estimates of the cumulative demand over the lead time that helped ensure better visibility of the possible demands.

Connecting Forecasts to the Inventory Plan: Advanced planning systems support forecast-based inventory management, which is a proactive approach that relies on demand forecasts and simulations to predict possible outcomes and their associated probabilities.  This data is used to determine optimal inventory levels.  Scenario-based or probabilistic forecasting contrasts with the more reactive nature of spreadsheet-based methods. A longtime customer in the fabric business, previously dealt with overstocks and stockouts due to intermittent demand for thousands of SKUs. They had no way of knowing what their stock-out risks were and so couldn’t proactively modify policies to mitigate risk other than making very rough-cut assumptions that tended to overstock grossly.  They adopted Smart Software’s demand and inventory planning software to generate simulations of demand that identified optimal Minimum On-Hand values and order quantities, maintaining product availability for immediate shipping, highlighting the advantages of a forecast-based inventory management approach.

Better Collaboration:  Sharing forecasts with key suppliers helps to ensure supply.  Kratos Space, part of Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., leveraged Smart forecasts to provide their Contract Manufacturers with better insights on future demand.  They used the forecasts to make commitments on future buys that enabled the CM to reduce material costs and lead times for engineered-to-order systems. This collaboration demonstrates how advanced forecasting techniques can lead to significant supply chain collaboration that yields efficiencies and cost savings for both parties.

​

MRO organizations exist in a wide range of  industries, including public transit, electrical utilities, wastewater, hydro power, aviation, and mining. To get their work done, MRO professionals use Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems. These systems are designed to do a lot of jobs. Given their features, cost, and extensive implementation requirements, there is an assumption that EAM and ERP systems can do it all.

For example, at a recent Maximo Utilities Working Group event, several prospects stated that “Our EAM will do that” when asked about requirements for forecasting usage, netting out supply plans, and optimizing inventory policies. They were surprised to learn it did not and wanted to know more.

In this post, we summarize the need for add-on software that addresses specialized analytics for inventory optimization, forecasting, and service parts planning.   

EAM Systems

EAM systems can’t ingest forecasts of future usage – these systems simply aren’t designed to conduct supply planning and many don’t even have a place to hold forecasts. So, when an MRO business needs to net out known requirements for planned production or capital projects, an add-on application like Smart IP&O is needed.

Inventory Optimization software with features that support planning known future demand will take project-based data not maintained in the EAM system (including project start dates, duration, and when each part is expected to be needed) and compute a period-by-period forecast over any planning horizon. That “planned” forecast can be projected alongside statistical forecasts of “unplanned” demand arising from normal wear and tear. At that point, parts planning software can net out the supply and identify gaps between supply and demand. This ensures that these gaps won’t go unnoticed and result in shortages that would otherwise delay the completion of the projects. It also minimizes excess stock that would otherwise be ordered too soon and needlessly consumes cash and warehouse space. Again, MRO businesses sometimes mistakenly assume that these capabilities are addressed by their EAM package.

ERP Systems

ERP systems, on the other hand, typically do include an MRP module that is designed to ingest a forecast and net out material requirements. Processing will consider current on hand inventory, open sales orders, scheduled jobs, incoming purchase orders, any bill of materials, and items in transit while transferring between sites. It will compare those current state values to the replenishment policy fields plus any monthly or weekly forecasts to determine when to suggest replenishment (a date) and how much to replenish (a quantity).

So, why not use the ERP system alone to net out the supply plan to prevent shortages and excess? First, while ERP systems have a placeholder for a forecast and some systems can net out supply using their MRP modules, they don’t make it easy to reconcile planned demand requirements associated with capital projects. Most of the time, the data on when planned projects will occur is maintained outside of the ERP, especially the project’s bill of materials detailing what parts will be needed to support the project. Second, many ERP systems don’t offer anything effective when it comes to predictive capabilities, relying instead on simple math that just won’t work for service parts due to the high prevalence of intermittent demand. Finally, ERP systems don’t have flexible user-friendly interfaces that support interacting with the forecasts and supply plan.

Reorder Point Logic

Both ERP and EAM have placeholders for reorder point replenishment methods such as Min/Max levels. You can use inventory optimization software to populate these fields with the risk-adjusted reorder point policies. Then within the ERP or EAM systems, orders are triggered whenever actual (not forecasted) demand drives on-hand stock below the Min. This type of policy doesn’t use a traditional forecast that projects demand week-over-week or month-over-month and is often referred to as “demand driven replenishment” (since orders only occur when actual demand drives stock below a user defined threshold).

But just because it isn’t using a period-over-period forecast doesn’t mean it isn’t being predictive. Reorder point policies should be based on a prediction of demand over a replenishment lead time plus a buffer to protect against demand and supply variability. MRO businesses need to know the stockout risk they are incurring with any given stocking policy. After all, inventory management is risk management – especially in MRO businesses when the cost of stockout is so high. Yet, ERP and EAM do not offer any capabilities to risk-adjust stocking policies. They force users to manually generate these policies externally or to use basic rule of thumb math that doesn’t detail the risks associated with the choice of policy.

Summary

Supply chain planning functionality such as inventory optimization isn’t the core focus of EAM  and ERP. You should leverage add-on planning platforms, like Smart IP&O, that support statistical forecasting, planned project management, and inventory optimization. Smart IP&O will develop forecasts and stocking policies that can be input to an EAM or ERP system to drive daily ordering.